Miejsce | Nazwisko i Imię | Uczelnia | typ | Czas |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kacper Mickiewicz | UKW Bydgoszcz | UNI | 3:00,9 |
2 | Patryk Szpak | AWF Warszawa | UWF | 3:02,5 |
3 | Filip Bałazy | PUM w Szczecinie | UME | 3:03,3 |
4 | Mikołaj Kot | AWF Warszawa | UWF | 3:03,4 |
5 | Dariusz Paczkowski | WSG Bydgoszcz | USP | 3:04,3 |
6 | Stefan Rostworowski | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:04,8 |
7 | Jan Aleksandrowicz | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:06,6 |
8 | Miłosz Jasiulewicz | UKW Bydgoszcz | UNI | 3:06,9 |
9 | Łukasz Spirka | PBŚ Bydgoszcz | UTE | 3:07,1 |
10 | Antoni Radomiński-Lasek | AGH Kraków | UTE | 3:07,4 |
11 | Kamil Adamczyk | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:07,9 |
12 | Rafał Hyra | PM Szczecin | USP | 3:08,2 |
13 | Andrii Mashentsev | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:08,3 |
14 | Szymon Stankiewicz | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:08,3 |
15 | Kacper Polański | UMK Toruń | UNI | 3:08,7 |
16 | Artur Zalewski | UKW Bydgoszcz | UNI | 3:09,7 |
17 | Dawid Seroka | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:09,9 |
18 | Hubert Guzy | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:10,2 |
19 | Tomasz Maicki | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:10,2 |
20 | Szymon Szczerbik | AGH Kraków | UTE | 3:10,5 |
21 | Przemysław Wilk | PŚk Kielce | UTE | 3:10,8 |
22 | Szymon Kowaliński | PWr Wrocław | UTE | 3:10,9 |
23 | Robert Urbański | AWFiS Gdańsk | UWF | 3:11,9 |
24 | Maciej Kaczorowski | UM Łódź | UME | 3:12,0 |
25 | Donat Cupiał | UM Łódź | UME | 3:12,6 |
26 | Piotr Osmański | AWFiS Gdańsk | UWF | 3:12,6 |
27 | Jakub Makal | AWFiS Gdańsk | UWF | 3:12,9 |
28 | Mateusz Narojczyk | WAT Warszawa | USP | 3:13,3 |
29 | Miłosz Mosur | PWr Wrocław | UTE | 3:13,4 |
30 | Paweł Skutta | PŚ Gliwice | UTE | 3:13,7 |
31 | Daniel Gut | AGH Kraków | UTE | 3:13,7 |
32 | Robert Kubiczek | PANS Nysa | USP | 3:14,0 |
33 | Jakub Piotrowski | PWr Wrocław | UTE | 3:14,1 |
34 | Kamil Rzepka | PŚk Kielce | UTE | 3:14,2 |
35 | Michał Radoliński | PP Poznań | UTE | 3:14,7 |
36 | Jakub Bednarek | UJK Kielce | UNI | 3:15,2 |
37 | Radosław Kmiecik | PP Poznań | UTE | 3:15,2 |
38 | Emil Karpiński | UWM Olsztyn | UNI | 3:15,4 |
39 | Ryszard Piasecki | UG Gdańsk | UNI | 3:15,4 |
40 | Mieszko Szymański | PM Szczecin | USP | 3:15,5 |
41 | Roman Nowak | AGH Kraków | UTE | 3:15,6 |
42 | Paweł Kacała | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:16,1 |
43 | Dariusz Stefanowski | PWr Wrocław | UTE | 3:16,2 |
44 | Miłosz Rogiński | GUMed Gdańsk | UME | 3:16,3 |
45 | Aleksander Chajda | UW Warszawa | UNI | 3:16,3 |
46 | Andrii Serga | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:16,6 |
47 | Dorian Zasada | PBŚ Bydgoszcz | UTE | 3:17,0 |
48 | Jan Szmyd | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:17,6 |
49 | Wojciech Pawicki | UG Gdańsk | UNI | 3:17,7 |
50 | Mateusz Świderski | PM Szczecin | USP | 3:17,8 |
51 | Szymon Tomczuk | UJ CM Kraków | UME | 3:18,5 |
52 | Jan Ciesielski | UPWr Wrocław | USP | 3:18,6 |
53 | Adam Kornacki | Uniwersytet Kaliski | USP | 3:18,6 |
54 | Michał Mucha | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:18,9 |
55 | Jakub Staudt | PWr Wrocław | UTE | 3:18,9 |
56 | Mateusz Marcinkowski | PŚk Kielce | UTE | 3:18,9 |
57 | Leonard Dziwisch | PUM w Szczecinie | UME | 3:19,0 |
58 | Rafał Skoczeń | UWM Olsztyn | UNI | 3:19,2 |
59 | Bartosz Lewczuk | SGGW Warszawa | USP | 3:19,2 |
60 | Antoni Czekala | UMK Toruń | UNI | 3:19,5 |
61 | Aleksander Ziółkowski | UG Gdańsk | UNI | 3:19,7 |
62 | Aleksander Sztajnert | UM Łódź | UME | 3:20,0 |
63 | Tadeusz Szymański | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:20,0 |
64 | Mateusz Kuc | PŚk Kielce | UTE | 3:20,2 |
65 | Michał Szubartowski | UM Lublin | UME | 3:20,6 |
66 | Marek Walentynowicz | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:20,7 |
67 | Yahor Bitel | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:20,7 |
68 | Filip Buliński | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:20,8 |
69 | Michał Błażuk | UM Łódź | UME | 3:21,1 |
70 | Mateusz Przybylski | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:22,0 |
71 | Filip Zmonarski | UPWr Wrocław | USP | 3:22,1 |
72 | Michał Boguszewski | SGGW Warszawa | USP | 3:22,2 |
73 | Bartosz Skała | UWM Olsztyn | UNI | 3:22,4 |
74 | Wojciech Wajer | GUMed Gdańsk | UME | 3:22,4 |
75 | Krzysztof Lis | PO Opole | UTE | 3:22,5 |
76 | Jakub Kośmiński | PANS Nysa | USP | 3:22,8 |
77 | Tomasz Zachwieja | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:22,9 |
78 | Krystian Więch | UE Katowice | USP | 3:22,9 |
79 | Wojciech Łabus | PP Poznań | UTE | 3:23,4 |
80 | Rafał Dembowski | UWM Olsztyn | UNI | 3:24,2 |
81 | Kacper Błażejczyk | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:25,1 |
82 | Wiktor Fiszbach | PRz Rzeszów | UTE | 3:25,2 |
83 | Kamil Adamek | PŚ Gliwice | UTE | 3:25,5 |
84 | Maciej Ruta | PM Szczecin | USP | 3:25,7 |
85 | Jan Sosnowski | PW Warszawa | UTE | 3:25,8 |
86 | Jakub Florczyk | PŚ Gliwice | UTE | 3:26,3 |
87 | Maksym Kuzmin | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:26,5 |
88 | Wiktor Orzeszko | PANS Nysa | USP | 3:26,8 |
89 | Stanisław Krasiński | UW Warszawa | UNI | 3:26,9 |
90 | Lev Zubenko | PŚk Kielce | UTE | 3:27,6 |
91 | Karol Królewski | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:27,8 |
92 | Bartosz Włodarz | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:28,0 |
93 | Kamil Krzeszowski | PRz Rzeszów | UTE | 3:28,0 |
94 | Bartosz Pszczółkowski | PG Gdańsk | UTE | 3:28,1 |
95 | Paweł Junik | PRz Rzeszów | UTE | 3:28,6 |
96 | Damian Marciniak | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:28,6 |
97 | Jakub Gonera | UJ Kraków | UNI | 3:28,8 |
98 | Bartosz Grabarek | PANS Nysa | USP | 3:29,1 |
99 | Oskar Nowak | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:30,4 |
100 | Stanisław Dawidziuk | PW Warszawa | UTE | 3:30,4 |
101 | Stanisław Sieniawski | UW Warszawa | UNI | 3:30,4 |
102 | Andrzej Grabowski | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:30,5 |
103 | Paweł Rak | AWF Warszawa | UWF | 3:30,5 |
104 | Wojciech Spychała | UPWr Wrocław | USP | 3:30,8 |
105 | Kacper Krasiński | US Szczecin | UNI | 3:31,6 |
106 | Wiktor Drwal | UPr Lublin | USP | 3:31,6 |
107 | Kacper Symula | PRz Rzeszów | UTE | 3:31,9 |
108 | Jakub Podlecki | SGGW Warszawa | USP | 3:32,6 |
109 | Łukasz Wójcik | AWF Warszawa | UWF | 3:32,7 |
110 | Tomisław Biernat | UE Katowice | USP | 3:33,4 |
111 | Bartosz Wróbel | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:33,5 |
112 | Szymon Taraska | PŁ Łódź | UTE | 3:33,7 |
113 | Adam Patoleta | US Szczecin | UNI | 3:34,5 |
114 | Dawid Grabek | PL Lublin | UTE | 3:34,9 |
115 | Michał Pływacz | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:35,0 |
116 | Kamil Puchała | UŁ Łódź | UNI | 3:35,1 |
117 | Szymon Kowalski | SGGW Warszawa | USP | 3:35,3 |
118 | Paweł Szromek | PŚ Gliwice | UTE | 3:35,7 |
119 | Łukasz Kolman | UM Lublin | UME | 3:36,6 |
120 | Patryk Janczyk | UŁ Łódź | UNI | 3:37,0 |
121 | Igor Bielik | AMW Gdynia | USP | 3:37,7 |
122 | Wiktor Makaruk | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:38,0 |
123 | Konrad Topolnicki | PO Opole | UTE | 3:39,9 |
124 | Artur Siekaczyński | UMCS Lublin | UNI | 3:40,2 |
125 | Kacper Pałka | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:40,3 |
126 | Jan Adamaszek | PK Kraków | UTE | 3:41,2 |
127 | Kamil Biliński | UR Rzeszów | UNI | 3:41,8 |
128 | Miłosz Szczudło | UR Rzeszów | UNI | 3:42,0 |
129 | Karol Smutek | UPr Lublin | USP | 3:42,2 |
130 | Bartosz Rosół | UE Katowice | USP | 3:45,0 |
131 | Nikodem Kowalski | UE Katowice | USP | 3:45,4 |
132 | Patryk Zdrodowski | UE Katowice | USP | 3:45,8 |
133 | Filip Derwich | PO Opole | UTE | 3:52,0 |
134 | Stanisław Nożyński | SGH Warszawa | USP | 3:56,2 |
135 | Miłosz Zubrzycki | UPWr Wrocław | USP | 3:59,8 |
AZS Warszawa
We firmly believe that the internet should be available and accessible to anyone, and are committed to providing a website that is accessible to the widest possible audience, regardless of circumstance and ability.
To fulfill this, we aim to adhere as strictly as possible to the World Wide Web Consortium’s (W3C) Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.1 (WCAG 2.1) at the AA level. These guidelines explain how to make web content accessible to people with a wide array of disabilities. Complying with those guidelines helps us ensure that the website is accessible to all people: blind people, people with motor impairments, visual impairment, cognitive disabilities, and more.
This website utilizes various technologies that are meant to make it as accessible as possible at all times. We utilize an accessibility interface that allows persons with specific disabilities to adjust the website’s UI (user interface) and design it to their personal needs.
Additionally, the website utilizes an AI-based application that runs in the background and optimizes its accessibility level constantly. This application remediates the website’s HTML, adapts Its functionality and behavior for screen-readers used by the blind users, and for keyboard functions used by individuals with motor impairments.
If you’ve found a malfunction or have ideas for improvement, we’ll be happy to hear from you. You can reach out to the website’s operators by using the following email
Our website implements the ARIA attributes (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) technique, alongside various different behavioral changes, to ensure blind users visiting with screen-readers are able to read, comprehend, and enjoy the website’s functions. As soon as a user with a screen-reader enters your site, they immediately receive a prompt to enter the Screen-Reader Profile so they can browse and operate your site effectively. Here’s how our website covers some of the most important screen-reader requirements, alongside console screenshots of code examples:
Screen-reader optimization: we run a background process that learns the website’s components from top to bottom, to ensure ongoing compliance even when updating the website. In this process, we provide screen-readers with meaningful data using the ARIA set of attributes. For example, we provide accurate form labels; descriptions for actionable icons (social media icons, search icons, cart icons, etc.); validation guidance for form inputs; element roles such as buttons, menus, modal dialogues (popups), and others. Additionally, the background process scans all the website’s images and provides an accurate and meaningful image-object-recognition-based description as an ALT (alternate text) tag for images that are not described. It will also extract texts that are embedded within the image, using an OCR (optical character recognition) technology. To turn on screen-reader adjustments at any time, users need only to press the Alt+1 keyboard combination. Screen-reader users also get automatic announcements to turn the Screen-reader mode on as soon as they enter the website.
These adjustments are compatible with all popular screen readers, including JAWS and NVDA.
Keyboard navigation optimization: The background process also adjusts the website’s HTML, and adds various behaviors using JavaScript code to make the website operable by the keyboard. This includes the ability to navigate the website using the Tab and Shift+Tab keys, operate dropdowns with the arrow keys, close them with Esc, trigger buttons and links using the Enter key, navigate between radio and checkbox elements using the arrow keys, and fill them in with the Spacebar or Enter key.Additionally, keyboard users will find quick-navigation and content-skip menus, available at any time by clicking Alt+1, or as the first elements of the site while navigating with the keyboard. The background process also handles triggered popups by moving the keyboard focus towards them as soon as they appear, and not allow the focus drift outside it.
Users can also use shortcuts such as “M” (menus), “H” (headings), “F” (forms), “B” (buttons), and “G” (graphics) to jump to specific elements.
We aim to support the widest array of browsers and assistive technologies as possible, so our users can choose the best fitting tools for them, with as few limitations as possible. Therefore, we have worked very hard to be able to support all major systems that comprise over 95% of the user market share including Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari, Opera and Microsoft Edge, JAWS and NVDA (screen readers).
Despite our very best efforts to allow anybody to adjust the website to their needs. There may still be pages or sections that are not fully accessible, are in the process of becoming accessible, or are lacking an adequate technological solution to make them accessible. Still, we are continually improving our accessibility, adding, updating and improving its options and features, and developing and adopting new technologies. All this is meant to reach the optimal level of accessibility, following technological advancements. For any assistance, please reach out to